Letterboxing Northern California - Yahoo Groups Archive

Statistics

2 messages in this thread | Started on 2005-01-20

Statistics

From: Lea Shangraw Fox (princesslea@alamedanet.net) | Date: 2005-01-20 08:39:34 UTC-08:00
Thanks Ryan for providing that link to Silent Doug's explanation page.
Thought I'd mention that everyone does this their own way, and I don't
use exactly the same system that Doug describes. For example, if a box
changes its stamp AND location, I count it as a new find. Also, I only
count as a find a box where I have been able to swap images, so if the
box is there but the stamp is missing, I don't count it. I also have a
list of "A" boxes, which is where I'm reasonably sure I've found the
correct hiding spot, but the box is gone (A=attempted). Tara keeps a
list of "D" boxes - those that she has found in her dreams! There's
also a new trend of Postal letterboxes, which I call PLB to distinguish
them from my regular P count. And finally, I keep an S count - number
of states where I've letterboxed. There are merit badges you can get
for almost all of these categories.

You guys are so lucky - I don't think there were 100 letterboxes in all
of California when I started and it took me a long time to reach that
hurdle! Keep on boxing, and I'll see you in April when we'll all
increase our X and E counts.

Princess Lea
P71 F359 X86 A26 E10 Plb4 S9


Re: [LbNCA] Statistics

From: Gwen and Don Jackson (foxsecurity@earthlink.net) | Date: 2005-01-20 08:58:54 UTC-08:00

----- Original Message -----
From: Lea Shangraw Fox
To: LbNCA@yahoogroups.com
Sent: Thursday, January 20, 2005 8:39 AM
Subject: [LbNCA] Statistics


You guys are so lucky - I don't think there were 100 letterboxes in all
of California when I started and it took me a long time to reach that
hurdle! Keep on boxing, and I'll see you in April when we'll all
increase our X and E counts.

Princess Lea
P71 F359 X86 A26 E10 Plb4 S9


It was 14 in California when we started, and now there is a target rich environment.

Don & Gwen
P176 F258 X21 C3

[Non-text portions of this message have been removed]